PROJECTS (updated Sept 2008)
    Classifications
Completed since 2007
New in 2008
Under construction
Approved
Pending approval
Costs
Generation Interconnections
T-D Interconnections
  RELATED RESOURCES
 
Tables PR-2 through PR-22 -- Project Detail Tables
Figures PR-1 through PR-5 -- Project Maps
Table PR-23 -- Summary of Changes
Table PR-24 -- Non-planning projects
Tables PR-2 through PR-13 -- Annual Project Tables
Tables PR-14 through PR-18 -- Project Tables by Zone
Table PR-19 - New ROW Line projects
Table PR-20 -- Existing ROW Line Projects
Table PR-21-- New Substations and Transformer Additions
Table PR-22 -- Substation Equipment Additions
Planning criteria
NEW IN 2008 PDF of Current Page
 

Summary of Planned, Proposed and Provisional additions, 2008-2023

The transmission facilities that we are proposing based on this Assessment are listed in Tables PR-2 through PR-22, and shown graphically by zone in Figures PR-1 through PR-5. Changes that have occurred since the 2007 Assessment are listed in Table PR-23.  Finally, Table PR-24 describes operations, maintenance and protection projects greater than $0.5 million for the years 2009-2013.

 

In each of these tables, there is a column indicating the planned in-service year for each particular facility and a column indicating the year the facility is needed. Often the year facilities are needed precedes the planned in-service year. There are a variety of reasons for this, including:

  • The preferred alternative to address a particular need may take several years to implement.
  • The need had been addressed with operating procedures that are becoming less effective or ineffective, necessitating a permanent solution.
  • The preferred alternative to address a particular need may need to be implemented in phases, thus delaying completion of the entire project.
  • New data or information affected the nature of the need or limitation, necessitating a change in the preferred alternative and introducing a delay in implementation.
  • The need for a project was based on load or generation development that was uncertain.
  • Stakeholder input necessitated a change in the alternative to be implemented, introducing a delay in implementation.

 

Tables PR-2 through PR-12 show the facilities planned by year for 2008-2023. Table PR-13 shows provisional facilities where the in-service date is yet to be determined.

 

Tables PR-14 through PR-18 show the facilities planned by zone.

 

Table PR-19 provides a list of planned transmission lines involving new right-of-way for 2008-2023. Since ATC intends to solicit public input on the identification of ultimate solutions through its public planning process, these particular projects may be modified in the future.

 

Table PR-20 provides a list of proposed transmission line rebuilds, line reconductoring and uprates on existing right-of-way.

 

Table PR-21 provides a list of proposed new substations and transformer additions (excluding transmission-to-distribution transformers).

 

Table PR-22 provides a list of other proposed substation equipment additions or replacements.

Need categories

Within these tables, the need for each project is identified. Need categories include the following:

 

 

Reliability

Facility (line, transformer, substation equipment) normal rating is exceeded under normal system conditions or emergency rating is exceeded under single contingency conditions, or bus voltage is not within 5 percent of nominal voltage under normal system conditions or is not within 10 percent of nominal voltage under single or multiple contingency conditions, or the contingency creates a cascading outage risk (see Planning criteria). Impending overload or voltage violations are noted as appropriate.

New

generation

In our generation interconnection studies and related transmission service studies, the facility has been identified as necessary to accommodate new generation.

T-D interconnection

Facility is required to interconnect to a new transmission- distribution substation needed by a distribution company served by ATC.

Condition

We have identified the facility as needing repair or replacement.

 

Stability

We have identified the facility as needed to ensure that our dynamic stability criteria is met (see Planning criteria), or to improve stability response of generation.

 

Economics

Preliminary and partial list of facilities emerging from our economic planning studies that may be beneficial in reducing congestion, enhancing system transfer capability and producing economic benefit.

 

 

 
Copyright 2008 American Transmission Company. All Rights Reserved